Hackers Targeting Company Backups

The Digital Vault Under Siege: Why Cybercriminals Are Now Targeting Your Backups

In the relentless, ever-escalating skirmish against cybercrime, we’re seeing a significant and frankly, rather alarming, tactical pivot from attackers. Gone are the days when their primary obsession was merely to breach your active networks, plant some malware, or siphon off data from live systems. Oh no, friends, that’s almost quaint now. Today, the sharpest minds on the dark web—and even state-sponsored groups, unfortunately—have turned their malevolent gaze squarely on your company’s backup infrastructure. Think about that for a moment. They aren’t just trying to rob your house; they’re trying to burn down your emergency shelter, too. This isn’t just a nuisance; it’s a deliberate, strategic move designed to kneecap your business continuity, maximize disruption, and ultimately, extort a far higher ransom.

It poses significant, existential challenges to organizations across the globe, forcing a profound rethinking of what ‘cybersecurity’ truly means in 2024 and beyond. We’re not just playing defense anymore; we’re trying to protect the very mechanisms we rely on to recover from a hit.

Protect your data with the self-healing storage solution that technical experts trust.

The Alarming Evolution of Cyberattack Strategies: From Front Door to Backdoor

Historically, our collective cybersecurity efforts were laser-focused on fortifying the perimeters and protecting the live, operational heart of our networks. We built formidable firewalls, deployed advanced endpoint detection, and meticulously managed network access. It was a strategy born from a simpler time, when the goal was often data exfiltration or simple denial-of-service. Businesses invested heavily, creating layers of defense around their primary digital assets, assuming that even if a breach occurred, recovery was always an option, a safety net beneath the high-wire act of daily operations.

However, the landscape, as it always does, has dramatically shifted. As our defenses around active systems grew more sophisticated, so too did the attackers’ reconnaissance. They observed. They learned. They understood something critical: the true linchpin of an organization’s resilience isn’t just its live data, but its ability to recover that data. They realized that by compromising backup systems, they don’t just steal or encrypt your data; they effectively sever your lifeline, rendering organizations unable to restore anything, thus exponentially amplifying the impact of their attacks. This isn’t just about data loss; it’s about operational paralysis, a business brought to its knees, devoid of the means to stand back up.

Think of it as the ultimate power play. If you can’t restore, you can’t operate. And if you can’t operate, what’s your alternative to paying the ransom? It’s a terrifying proposition, isn’t it? It truly flips the script on traditional incident response.

Why Backups Are Now the Prime Target

So, why this particular fixation on backups? It isn’t random; it’s a calculated decision born from a deep understanding of business operations and human psychology.

Firstly, it’s about maximizing impact and leverage. If attackers can compromise your live systems and your backups, they’ve essentially put you in a digital straitjacket. You can’t rebuild, you can’t recover your critical data, and you’re left with little choice but to negotiate. The ransom demand isn’t just for decryption keys; it’s for your entire business’s future.

Secondly, these sophisticated groups know that time is money. Prolonged downtime, often a direct result of compromised backups, translates into massive financial losses, reputational damage, and even regulatory fines. The longer you’re down, the more desperate you become, and the higher the chances you’ll meet their demands. It’s an ugly calculus, but it’s effective.

Then there’s the insidious combination of exfiltration and encryption. It’s not uncommon for threat actors to first steal sensitive data from your live systems—employee records, customer information, intellectual property—and then encrypt everything, including your backups. This double-whammy means even if you manage to restore some data, the threat of public exposure or sale of your private information still looms large. It’s a very real Sword of Damocles hanging over your head.

Finally, the rise of supply chain vulnerabilities and the increasing reliance on third-party cloud services have inadvertently created new attack vectors. If an attacker can breach a vendor who manages your backups, they gain access to all their clients’ recovery mechanisms. It’s like finding a master key to an entire neighborhood’s safety deposit boxes. We often trust these vendors implicitly, but that trust is increasingly being exploited.

A Chilling Gallery of High-Profile Incidents

Let’s not just talk hypotheticals; the evidence is unfortunately piling up. Several recent, high-profile incidents starkly illustrate this emerging and devastating threat:

The Capita Catastrophe (2023)

Take the 2023 cyberattack on Capita, for example, a colossal British business process outsourcing provider. This wasn’t some fly-by-night operation; it was a well-executed breach that saw hackers not only gain access to Capita’s systems but also exfiltrate massive volumes of sensitive client and staff information. Crucially, they deployed ransomware, leading to prolonged outages that rippled across significant parts of Capita’s business. For weeks, services were disrupted, critical data was inaccessible, and clients faced their own operational headaches because of a breach far upstream.

This incident wasn’t just about data being stolen; it highlighted the attackers’ ability to disrupt core services by targeting the foundational elements of IT infrastructure. It prompted investigations, regulatory scrutiny, and a lot of very uncomfortable conversations in boardrooms about third-party risk and the true cost of inadequate recovery strategies. It’s a potent reminder that your security is only as strong as your weakest link, and sometimes, that link might just be your most trusted partner.

The Foreshadowing: SonicWall’s Cloud Backup Breach (Reported September 2025)

Now, let’s look at something that, while still a bit out on the horizon in its full confirmation, serves as a chilling forecast of where things are heading. As reported in late 2025, cybersecurity vendor SonicWall confirmed that sophisticated, state-sponsored threat actors had breached its cloud backup service. What did they get? Alarmingly, they accessed firewall configuration files for all users.

Imagine that for a second. The blueprints for your primary network defenses, in the hands of a hostile nation-state. This kind of breach doesn’t just disrupt; it provides a strategic advantage for future, more targeted attacks. It forces immediate, urgent customer resets, and, as you’d expect, massive governance reforms. It screams to the world that even the most advanced security companies aren’t immune, and their cloud-based backup solutions can become incredibly attractive targets for those seeking strategic intelligence, not just quick cash. It’s a stark warning of the broader implications when vital configuration data, often stored in backups, falls into the wrong hands.

Akira Ransomware’s Targeted Assaults (Ongoing)

We’ve also been observing the Akira ransomware operation, which shows a truly surgical precision in its targeting. Akira isn’t just broadly spraying its ransomware; it’s actively hunting for specific backup technologies. Reports indicate that Akira has been exploiting vulnerabilities in SonicWall SonicOS and unpatched Veeam Backup & Replication servers to directly target Nutanix AHV virtual machine disk files.

This isn’t just opportunistic; it’s a dedicated approach. It tells us that these groups are doing their homework, understanding the specific software stacks organizations rely on for their virtualized environments and, crucially, for their backups. They know that if they can take out the virtual machines and the backups, they’ve got you. It highlights a worrying trend: attackers are becoming specialists in dismantling recovery mechanisms, demanding that we, too, become specialists in fortifying them.

CloudNordic’s Devastating Loss (2023)

Perhaps one of the most brutal illustrations of this threat comes from CloudNordic in 2023. This Danish cloud provider suffered an attack where hackers encrypted not just their primary systems, but all company disks, including multiple layers of backups. Despite having what they thought were robust firewalls and antivirus software in place, the company found itself in an impossible situation. They simply couldn’t recover most customer data, leading to a complete halt in operations for an extended period.

It’s a stark, almost heartbreaking tale. They had defenses, they had backups, but the attackers found a way to compromise the entire recovery chain. This incident underscores a terrifying reality: simply having backups isn’t enough; they must be unassailable. It’s a chilling reminder that, as Jon Fielding, Managing Director for Apricorn EMEA, wisely put it, ‘We all know that breaches are almost inevitable, so being able to recover from a breach should be as high on the boardroom agenda as being able to prepare for one.’ He’s absolutely spot on, isn’t he?

Fortifying the Last Line of Defense: Comprehensive Backup Security Strategies

The rising tide of these incidents makes it unequivocally clear: securing your backup infrastructure isn’t just good practice; it’s mission-critical. It’s the ultimate ‘break glass in case of emergency’ scenario, and you simply can’t afford for that glass to be shattered before the emergency. Here’s how you can bolster your defenses:

The Golden Rule: Backup Isolation (Air-Gapping) and Immutability

This is perhaps the most crucial strategy. Air-gapping ensures your backup systems are physically or logically isolated from your main network. In a world where even internal systems can be compromised, a truly air-gapped backup remains impervious. This could mean physically disconnected tapes, or it could involve sophisticated logical separation in cloud environments, where backups are only accessible for very brief, controlled windows.

Similarly, embracing immutable backups is non-negotiable. Immutability means that once data is written to the backup, it cannot be altered or deleted for a specified period, typically weeks or months. Even if an attacker gains access to your backup environment, they won’t be able to encrypt or delete your immutable copies. This is the digital equivalent of pouring concrete around your recovery data. It’s the ultimate safeguard against ransomware’s most devastating attack vector. Many storage solutions, both on-premises and cloud-based, now offer immutable storage options, and you should absolutely be leveraging them.

Think of it as the extended 3-2-1 rule: at least 3 copies of your data, on 2 different types of media, with 1 copy offsite. Now, let’s add an even stronger layer: ensure at least one of those copies is air-gapped and immutable. That’s the gold standard we’re aiming for.

Robust Access Controls and Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) Everywhere

You wouldn’t leave the keys to your house under the doormat, would you? So why would you allow easy access to your backup systems? Implement stringent access controls based on the principle of least privilege. This means users, and even automated processes, should only have the minimal permissions necessary to perform their specific tasks. A system administrator might need full access, but a monitoring tool probably only needs read access.

Crucially, Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) must be enforced for all access to backup systems, without exception. This isn’t just for human users; where possible, extend MFA or robust credential management to service accounts that interact with your backups. If an attacker breaches one set of credentials, MFA acts as a vital secondary barrier, often frustrating their attempts to move laterally into your backup environment. It’s a simple, yet incredibly effective layer of defense that many organizations still overlook for internal systems, and that’s just asking for trouble.

Encryption: At Rest and In Transit

Data encryption isn’t just for your live systems; it’s absolutely vital for your backups. Ensure that backup data is encrypted both at rest (when stored on disks, tapes, or in the cloud) and in transit (as it moves across networks to its backup destination). This protects your data even if it’s intercepted or if the physical storage media falls into the wrong hands.

Proper key management is, of course, critical here. Who controls the encryption keys? How are they protected? Losing your encryption keys is almost as bad as losing the data itself, so treat them with the utmost security. This means dedicated key management systems, strong access controls around those systems, and never storing keys alongside the encrypted data.

Regular Testing, Validation, and Disaster Recovery Drills

This is where many organizations fall short. Simply creating backups isn’t enough; you must test them. Regularly. Seriously, this isn’t optional. Conducting routine tests ensures that data can be restored effectively, that your recovery processes are functioning as intended, and that you haven’t accidentally backed up corrupted or incomplete data.

And I’m not just talking about a quick file restore. You need to conduct full disaster recovery drills where you simulate a catastrophic event—a ransomware attack, a major hardware failure, even a natural disaster—and attempt to restore your entire infrastructure from your backups. Involve not just your IT team, but also business stakeholders. Do they know what to expect? Can critical applications come back online within acceptable timeframes? My friend Sarah, she runs IT for a mid-sized law firm, and she insists on annual full-system recovery drills. The first one was a nightmare, she told me, took them days to sort out. But after a few iterations, they cut their recovery time by over 70%, identifying critical gaps they never would have found otherwise. It’s always an eye-opener.

These drills aren’t just technical exercises; they reveal gaps in communication, resource allocation, and even business process understanding. They help you refine your Incident Response Plan for backup compromise, which, let’s be honest, you absolutely need to have.

Automated and Monitored Backup Processes

Manual backups are a relic of the past, fraught with human error and inconsistency. Utilize automated backup solutions to central and personal repositories. Automation ensures backups happen on schedule, consistently, and without human intervention, which drastically reduces the chances of missing a critical backup window or making a mistake.

Beyond automation, robust monitoring and alerting are non-negotiable. You need to know immediately if a backup fails, if a job is incomplete, or if there’s any unauthorized access attempt on your backup systems. Implement logging, auditing, and alert mechanisms that notify relevant personnel of any anomalies. It’s not enough to set it and forget it; you need to keep a vigilant eye on the guardians of your data.

Vendor Due Diligence for Cloud Backups

If you’re leveraging cloud providers or managed backup services, your responsibility doesn’t end at signing the contract. You need to perform rigorous vendor due diligence. Scrutinize their security posture. Ask the hard questions:

  • How do they air-gap your data?
  • What are their encryption standards, and how do they manage keys?
  • What are their recovery time objectives (RTOs) and recovery point objectives (RPOs), and have they tested them?
  • What security certifications do they hold (ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type 2)?
  • What’s their incident response plan in the event they are breached, and how would that impact your data?

Remember, you’re entrusting them with your last line of defense. Choose wisely, and verify continuously.

The All-Important Human Element and Security Culture

No amount of technology can fully compensate for human error or negligence. Investing in comprehensive employee training is crucial. Staff need to be educated on the latest phishing tactics, social engineering techniques, and secure computing practices. A single click on a malicious link can be the initial foothold an attacker needs to compromise your entire environment, including your backups.

Beyond training, fostering a security-first organizational culture is paramount. Leadership must champion cybersecurity from the top down, allocating sufficient budget, resources, and time for security initiatives. When everyone understands their role in protecting the organization’s digital assets, it creates a much stronger defense perimeter. It isn’t just an IT problem; it’s a business problem, and everyone needs to be part of the solution.

The Unavoidable Cost of Inaction

When we talk about investing in sophisticated backup security, it’s easy to see it as a cost center. But let’s be clear: the cost of inaction far, far outweighs the cost of proactive security measures.

Think about it: a ransomware payment can easily run into the millions, sometimes tens of millions of dollars. But that’s just the tip of the iceberg. Then you have the crippling financial impact of extended downtime—lost revenue, lost productivity, missed deadlines. Regulatory fines from GDPR, HIPAA, or other data protection laws can be astronomical, often levied not just for the breach itself, but for inadequate security measures that led to it.

And perhaps most damaging, though harder to quantify, is the irreparable harm to your reputation and customer trust. In today’s interconnected world, news of a major data breach travels fast. Customers will inevitably question your ability to protect their data, and regaining that trust can take years, if it’s even possible. Prospective clients may look elsewhere, and your market position could erode significantly. The long-term impact on shareholder value can be devastating.

Proactive security, on the other hand, is an investment in your business’s resilience, its stability, and its future. It’s akin to insurance, but with a much higher probability of directly preventing catastrophic loss. Can you really afford not to secure your backups? It’s a rhetorical question, of course, but one we all need to answer honestly.

Conclusion: Reimagining Resilience in a Hostile Digital Landscape

The evolving tactics of cybercriminals, particularly their calculated shift to targeting backup systems, demand nothing less than a complete paradigm shift in how organizations approach cybersecurity. It’s no longer sufficient to merely protect your live data; you must vigorously defend your ability to recover that data. Your backups are no longer just an administrative task or a ‘nice to have’; they are your last, most critical line of defense, and frankly, they’re under siege.

By proactively securing backup infrastructures with robust air-gapping, immutability, stringent access controls, and unwavering encryption, combined with diligent testing and a pervasive security culture, businesses can significantly bolster their resilience against these increasingly sophisticated threats. It won’t be easy, and it won’t be cheap, but the alternative—total operational collapse at the hands of opportunistic attackers—is a price no organization should ever have to pay. The future of your business hinges on your ability to not just prepare for a breach, but to confidently recover from one. Let’s make sure that digital vault is truly impenetrable, shall we?

21 Comments

  1. So, if attackers are targeting backups, does this mean we need backups of our backups? Is “backupception” the next level of cybersecurity, or are we just creating more potential targets?

    • That’s a great question! While ‘backupception’ sounds like a fun sci-fi concept, creating more targets might outweigh the benefits. A better approach involves making existing backups immutable and isolated, ensuring attackers can’t reach or alter them, regardless of how many backup layers exist. It’s about resilience, not redundancy. What security methods do you think are most important?

      Editor: StorageTech.News

      Thank you to our Sponsor Esdebe

  2. “Burning down the emergency shelter” is a vivid analogy! Makes you wonder if cybersecurity insurance now needs a separate ‘backup hostage’ clause. Anyone seen policies adapt to this dark trend yet? #cybersecurity #backups #ransomware

    • Thanks for highlighting the analogy! The question about cybersecurity insurance adapting is spot on. It’s definitely time for policies to evolve and specifically address backup security and recovery costs related to ransomware. Has anyone else encountered policies that offer comprehensive backup protection?

      Editor: StorageTech.News

      Thank you to our Sponsor Esdebe

  3. The point about supply chain vulnerabilities is crucial. Many organizations depend on third-party vendors for backup solutions. What strategies can businesses implement to ensure their vendors maintain adequate security measures and promptly address vulnerabilities?

    • That’s a really important point! Thinking about vendor security, a robust risk assessment process is key. Regular audits, penetration testing results and SOC2 compliance should be reviewed, and strong contractual clauses regarding security expectations are essential. Any other thoughts on vendor relationships?

      Editor: StorageTech.News

      Thank you to our Sponsor Esdebe

  4. The CloudNordic example is a stark reminder of the importance of comprehensive backup security. Testing and validation are critical, but simulating full disaster recovery drills involving business stakeholders could expose gaps that technical tests alone might miss. Have others found this to be true?

    • Great point! You’re right, involving business stakeholders in disaster recovery drills is crucial. Their input can highlight dependencies or process bottlenecks that tech teams might not be aware of. Has anyone else experienced surprising revelations during cross-functional recovery simulations?

      Editor: StorageTech.News

      Thank you to our Sponsor Esdebe

  5. The discussion of vendor due diligence is critical. Regularly reviewing vendors’ security certifications and incident response plans is essential. Also, performing penetration testing on vendor-managed backup solutions would provide an additional layer of assurance.

    • I agree, the vendor relationship piece is so crucial! Penetration testing vendor-managed solutions is a great point. Have you found any specific frameworks helpful for assessing vendor security, or unique methods for verifying their claims beyond standard certifications? Always looking for ways to strengthen these checks.

      Editor: StorageTech.News

      Thank you to our Sponsor Esdebe

  6. “Burning down the emergency shelter” is a fantastic analogy! I’m curious, with attackers now treating backups like a high-value target, are we seeing a rise in “ethical hacking” services specializing in testing backup recovery strategies? Perhaps white hats can help organizations find vulnerabilities before the black hats do.

    • Thanks! That’s a really insightful question. I think we are in the early stages of seeing that. More organizations are realizing they need specialized expertise to test their backup and recovery strategies beyond typical penetration testing. “Ethical hacking” focused on backup resilience is definitely an area with huge potential for growth!

      Editor: StorageTech.News

      Thank you to our Sponsor Esdebe

  7. Burning down the emergency shelter and targeting backups… it’s like they’re playing digital scorched earth! So, beyond these robust strategies, are we talking about some kind of “backup insurance” policy that specifically covers the costs of ransomware attacks on backups? Asking for a friend, of course.

    • That “scorched earth” analogy really hits home! It raises an interesting point about insurance. While specific ‘backup hostage’ clauses might be emerging, a broader approach to cyber insurance, covering data recovery costs and business interruption due to backup compromise, is what many are seeking. Curious to hear if others have experience with that!

      Editor: StorageTech.News

      Thank you to our Sponsor Esdebe

  8. Burning down emergency shelters, eh? If backups are the new high-value target, should we start applying military-grade camouflage to them? Asking for purely strategic, non-paranoia related reasons, of course.

    • That’s a great point! If attackers are going after backups directly, maybe we need to think outside the box. Could AI-powered anomaly detection learn to spot malicious activity within backup systems themselves, acting as a sort of digital early warning system? What are peoples thoughts on AI solutions that could help detect malicious software?

      Editor: StorageTech.News

      Thank you to our Sponsor Esdebe

  9. The emphasis on employee training is spot on. Perhaps incorporating gamified security awareness programs could further reinforce best practices and create a more proactive security culture.

    • I’m glad you highlighted the importance of employee training! Gamification is a fantastic idea. Making security awareness engaging and fun could definitely boost participation and retention, turning employees into active participants in our defense strategy. Thanks for the insightful suggestion!

      Editor: StorageTech.News

      Thank you to our Sponsor Esdebe

  10. “Burning down the emergency shelter” is a memorable analogy! Perhaps we need to consider geographically diverse backups? Imagine having a backup in a different country. It would be a real headache for attackers to compromise multiple locations simultaneously, wouldn’t it?

    • I’m glad the analogy resonated! The point about geographically diverse backups is excellent! Spreading backups across different countries adds a significant layer of complexity for attackers. This could also mitigate risks associated with regional disasters, ensuring continuity. What are your thoughts on the compliance implications of storing data in different regions?

      Editor: StorageTech.News

      Thank you to our Sponsor Esdebe

  11. The article highlights the rising threat of attacks targeting backups. Given the increasing sophistication of these attacks, is there a framework for prioritizing which backup systems and data sets require the most stringent security measures, considering factors like business criticality and data sensitivity?

Leave a Reply to StorageTech.News Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.


*