UK Government Proposes Ransomware Payment Ban for Public Sector

Summary

The UK government is considering banning ransomware payments by public sector bodies and critical national infrastructure organizations. This proposal aims to disrupt the ransomware business model by disincentivizing attacks on these entities. A public consultation is open until April 8, 2025, seeking input on the scope and implementation of these measures.

Explore the data solution with built-in protection against ransomware TrueNAS.

Main Story

Okay, so the UK government’s been cooking up some new plans to fight ransomware, and honestly, it’s about time! You know, those nasty attacks where hackers lock up your data and demand a ransom? Yeah, those. They’re getting way out of hand, it seems.

Their big idea? They’re thinking about banning public sector organizations and critical infrastructure operators from actually paying the ransom. It’s a bold move, for sure, and it’s all part of trying to seriously beef up our nation’s cyber defenses. We’re talking about places like the NHS, local councils, even schools, these are key pieces of national infrastructure that are being targeted and its unacceptable. These proposals, which were announced on January 14, 2025, are now up for public consultation, and people can give their thoughts until April 8, 2025. It’s important, so you might even want to take a look.

Ransomware is a major pain, and it’s not just a minor inconvenience. It’s become so common, so sophisticated and it’s costing people serious money. In fact, they reckon that about a billion dollars went to ransomware criminals in 2023 alone, isn’t that insane? That is, if you can believe these numbers. It is a huge amount of money. The UK government is calling it the ‘most acute cyber threat’ right now, which, frankly, is not hard to believe. This is a real crisis and requires real solutions.

So, here’s the meat of the plan, broken down into a few key parts:

  • First, the ban on paying ransoms. This is the big one. The government wants to make it illegal for public sector bodies and places handling critical national infrastructure to give in and pay. The idea is that if they can’t get a payday from those kinds of organizations the attacks will decrease. They figure, if there’s no money in it, the criminals will look for other targets. It’s kind of a no-brainer, or so you’d think! I mean, they already banned central government departments from doing it.

  • Second, a ‘ransomware payment prevention regime.’ This part is about getting the National Crime Agency (NCA) more involved. They’d want to be in the loop when these attacks are happening, offer advice to the victims and even try to block payments, especially to those known bad actors. It’s about getting ahead of the game, essentially.

  • Third, and finally, a mandatory reporting regime. This bit’s about transparency. They want organizations to report ransomware attacks quickly, like within 72 hours, so law enforcement can gather information. This would allow them to track threats, understand the playing field and, hopefully, stop attacks in progress. The more we know, the better we can protect ourselves, right?

Now, these proposals are still in the consultation phase. So, the government’s asking for feedback on all of this. They’re thinking about how it’s all going to work in reality. What’s the scope of this ban? What, if any, exemptions should there be? And, of course, what about the consequences if someone doesn’t play ball? They’re even considering criminal sanctions for not following the rules, so they aren’t messing around.

Look, there are definitely differing opinions on all of this. Some people think the ban will make a real difference by cutting out the financial motive for cyber criminals. Then, you’ve got others, they are worried that banning payments might leave organizations stuck with no data and even more issues. It’s a fair point. It could create some serious disruption, and you can imagine the headache it would cause! The consultation will need to carefully weigh these things up to strike the right balance. I’d say the most effective plan will consider the most vulnerable, small organizations.

And here’s another thing, while it’s just focused on the public sector right now, they are considering rolling this out across the entire economy. That means everyone in the UK, big companies, and small businesses and even individuals. It’s a big possibility. Whether that happens really depends on this consultation. Anyway, I think it’s all a step in the right direction. It won’t solve everything at a stroke, of course, but the more proactive we are in addressing this, the better we’ll be at keeping ourselves safe from these cyber crooks.

9 Comments

  1. A billion dollars to ransomware criminals, you say? I’m in the wrong business, clearly. Perhaps I should start a side hustle of data hostage-taking, or is that market saturated now?

    • That billion-dollar figure is staggering, isn’t it? It really highlights the scale of the problem. It’ll be interesting to see if these new measures can actually impact those kinds of numbers and perhaps redirect some of that investment into cyber security.

      Editor: StorageTech.News

      Thank you to our Sponsor Esdebe – https://esdebe.com

  2. A mandatory reporting regime with a 72 hour window, you say? Sounds optimistic given the time it takes to fill out a form about a dodgy expense claim.

    • That’s a great point about the 72-hour reporting window. It definitely highlights the challenge of balancing speed with thoroughness in these situations. Perhaps streamlining the reporting process itself would be a key factor in ensuring compliance and effectiveness.

      Editor: StorageTech.News

      Thank you to our Sponsor Esdebe – https://esdebe.com

  3. The consultation period provides a valuable opportunity to refine the scope of the proposed ban, considering potential exemptions and consequences for non-compliance, to ensure its effectiveness.

    • That’s a really important point. Defining the scope and consequences will be key! I wonder how the consultation will balance the need for clear rules with the flexibility required to handle diverse situations and organizations? It will also be interesting to see any potential exemptions.

      Editor: StorageTech.News

      Thank you to our Sponsor Esdebe – https://esdebe.com

  4. A public consultation? That sounds like a great opportunity for some strongly worded opinions and endless debates. I bet the feedback forms will be a joy.

    • You’re spot on, that consultation process could certainly generate some very passionate responses! It’s a crucial stage though, getting diverse perspectives to help refine the proposals before they become policy.

      Editor: StorageTech.News

      Thank you to our Sponsor Esdebe – https://esdebe.com

  5. Given the proposal to extend this ban across the entire economy, how might the government support smaller businesses in strengthening their cyber defenses?

Comments are closed.