The Evolving Landscape of Security Telemetry: From Deluge to Actionable Intelligence

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

Abstract

Modern cybersecurity operations are increasingly reliant on the effective collection, processing, and analysis of security telemetry. This research report delves into the foundational aspects of security telemetry, defining it as the granular data generated across an organization’s digital ecosystem, encompassing endpoints, network infrastructure, applications, and user activities. We explore the diverse types of telemetry, ranging from traditional logs and network flow data to more sophisticated endpoint and cloud-native signals. The report meticulously identifies the myriad sources and collection methodologies crucial for comprehensive visibility. Furthermore, it details the intricate lifecycle of telemetry, from initial ingestion and normalization through advanced analysis and long-term retention, highlighting its indispensable role in threat detection, incident response, and regulatory compliance. A significant portion of this report is dedicated to dissecting the inherent challenges associated with managing and deriving meaningful insights from the sheer volume, velocity, and variety of security telemetry. We also offer forward-looking perspectives on how emerging technologies, such as artificial intelligence and machine learning, alongside evolving architectural paradigms like data lakes, are poised to transform the future of security telemetry, enabling organizations to transition from a state of data overload to one of proactive, intelligent security. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive, expert-level understanding of security telemetry, its complexities, and its strategic importance in contemporary cybersecurity.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

1. Introduction

The digital landscape, characterized by pervasive connectivity, cloud adoption, and a burgeoning threat surface, generates an unprecedented volume of data that holds the key to an organization’s security posture. This data, collectively referred to as security telemetry, represents the raw, granular signals emanating from every observable point within an enterprise’s IT infrastructure. It encompasses a vast array of information, from system logs and network traffic patterns to application events and user behavioral data, all of which, when properly collected and analyzed, can reveal malicious activities, policy violations, and system vulnerabilities. The sheer scale and complexity of this data, often described as a “deluge” or “relentless explosion,” present both immense opportunities and significant challenges for cybersecurity professionals. [8]

Historically, security operations relied on discrete security tools, each generating its own siloed alerts. However, the sophistication of modern cyber threats necessitates a holistic view, integrating disparate data points to form a cohesive narrative of potential compromise. This shift has elevated security telemetry from a supplementary resource to the central nervous system of a robust security operations center (SOC). The ability to effectively harness this telemetry is paramount for proactive threat hunting, efficient incident response, and demonstrating compliance with an ever-expanding body of regulations. [7] This report aims to provide a comprehensive and expert-level examination of security telemetry, exploring its fundamental nature, diverse manifestations, intricate lifecycle, and the critical role it plays in securing contemporary enterprises, while also addressing the significant hurdles associated with its management and analysis.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

2. Defining Security Telemetry

Security telemetry refers to the machine-generated data points that provide insight into the operational state, activities, and security posture of an information system. [1] It is the automated collection and analysis of security-related data from various sources to detect and respond to potential security threats. [1] Unlike processed alerts or high-level summaries, telemetry is characterized by its raw, often unaggregated nature, offering a granular view of system behavior. [3] It is the fundamental building block from which security events, incidents, and threat intelligence are derived. The essence of security telemetry lies in its ability to provide factual, verifiable records of what transpired within an environment, enabling forensic analysis, behavioral baselining, and detection of anomalies that may indicate a compromise. [3]

This data is collected continuously and systematically from a multitude of sources across an organization’s IT and security infrastructure. Its value is not in any single data point but in the collective context and correlation of these points. [3] For instance, an individual log entry indicating a failed login attempt might be benign. However, when correlated with hundreds of similar attempts from a suspicious IP address across multiple user accounts and simultaneous network traffic spikes, it transforms into a critical indicator of a brute-force attack. Thus, security telemetry forms the bedrock of situational awareness, allowing security teams to understand not just that something happened, but what, when, where, how, and who was involved. [3]

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

3. Types of Security Telemetry

The diversity of digital assets and operational contexts necessitates a wide array of telemetry types, each providing a unique lens into system behavior. Understanding these categories is crucial for designing a comprehensive data collection strategy.

3.1. Log Data

Log data constitutes one of the most fundamental and ubiquitous forms of security telemetry. [2] These are timestamped records generated by systems, applications, and devices, providing a historical record of activities. [2] Examples include:

• Operating System Logs: Windows Event Logs (security, system, application) and Linux syslog entries (authentication attempts, process executions, kernel messages). These provide insights into user activity, system health, and potential compromise indicators. [4], [11]
• Application Logs: Generated by web servers, databases, enterprise applications, and custom software. They record application-specific events like successful/failed transactions, data access, and API calls, vital for detecting application-layer attacks. [10]
• Security Device Logs: Firewalls, Intrusion Detection/Prevention Systems (IDS/IPS), Web Application Firewalls (WAFs), and proxies generate logs detailing blocked connections, detected intrusions, policy violations, and web traffic filtering. [3]

Logs are the oldest and most basic type of telemetry data, often arbitrary, timestamped text records providing specific information about the system at a given time. [2]

3.2. Event Data

While often derived from logs, event data typically refers to parsed, normalized, and potentially enriched records of specific incidents that occur within a system. [2] An event is a specific, discrete action or state change. For instance, a raw log line might be parsed into a structured event indicating “User ‘X’ logged in from IP ‘Y’ at time ‘Z’.” Events are easier to query, correlate, and analyze than raw logs, forming the basis for many security information and event management (SIEM) systems. [3]

3.3. Alert Data

Alerts are a specific type of event data that signifies a deviation from expected behavior or a detection of a known threat pattern. They are typically generated by security tools (e.g., IDS/IPS, EDR, antivirus) when a predefined rule or anomaly is triggered. While alerts are a direct output of security analysis, the underlying telemetry that triggered the alert is equally, if not more, important for validation and further investigation.

3.4. Network Flow Data

Network flow data, such as NetFlow, IPFIX, and sFlow, provides summaries of network conversations rather than capturing the full packet content. Each flow record typically includes source/destination IP addresses, ports, protocols, timestamps, and byte/packet counts. [2], [3] This data is invaluable for understanding network topology, identifying suspicious communication patterns (e.g., unauthorized internal scanning, data exfiltration attempts), and baselining normal network behavior without the extensive storage requirements of full packet capture. [2]

3.5. Endpoint Telemetry

With the rise of Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions, endpoint telemetry has become a cornerstone of modern security. [2] This highly granular data collected directly from workstations, servers, and mobile devices offers insights into device behavior and potential security issues. [2] It includes:

• Process creation and termination [4]
• File system modifications (creation, deletion, access) [4]
• Registry key changes
• Network connections initiated by processes [4]
• DLL loading and memory activities
• Driver installations

This rich data allows for deep visibility into adversarial tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) at the execution level, enabling the detection of stealthy malware and sophisticated insider threats. [4]

3.6. Cloud Telemetry

As organizations migrate to cloud environments, cloud-native telemetry becomes critical. Cloud providers (AWS, Azure, GCP) offer extensive logging and monitoring services that capture interactions with cloud resources. [6] Examples include:

• AWS CloudTrail: Records API calls made to AWS services, indicating who did what, when, and from where.
• Azure Monitor/Activity Logs: Collects operational data from Azure resources, providing insights into resource creation, modification, and deletion.
• GCP Cloud Logging: Aggregates logs from various Google Cloud services, covering administrative activities, data access, and system events.

This telemetry is vital for securing cloud infrastructure, detecting misconfigurations, unauthorized access, and compliance violations in dynamic cloud environments. [6]

3.7. Identity Telemetry

Identity telemetry focuses on user and system authentication and authorization activities. [3] This includes logs from:

• Directory Services: Active Directory, LDAP, Okta, Azure AD, recording login attempts, password changes, group modifications.
• Identity and Access Management (IAM) Systems: Tracking access requests, role assignments, and privileged access management (PAM) sessions. [3]

This data is crucial for detecting account compromise, insider threats, and privilege escalation attempts. [3]

3.8. Vulnerability and Configuration Data

While not strictly “event-based,” data from vulnerability scanners, configuration management databases (CMDBs), and asset inventories is increasingly integrated with real-time telemetry. [3] This contextual data enriches events by identifying vulnerable assets, misconfigured systems, and their associated business criticality, aiding in risk-based prioritization of alerts. [3]

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

4. Sources and Collection Methods

The effective collection of security telemetry relies on diverse sources and robust methodologies to ensure comprehensive visibility across the enterprise attack surface. [7]

4.1. Diverse Sources

Security telemetry originates from virtually every component of an organization’s digital infrastructure: [6]

• Endpoints: Workstations (Windows, macOS, Linux), servers (physical and virtual), mobile devices, IoT devices. These provide critical insights into user behavior, malware execution, and data access. [3], [7]
• Network Infrastructure: Routers, switches, firewalls, intrusion detection/prevention systems (IDS/IPS), proxies, load balancers. [3] These devices are the gatekeepers of network traffic, providing logs on connections, blocks, and attacks. [3]
• Applications: Web servers (Apache, Nginx, IIS), database servers (SQL, NoSQL), enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems, customer relationship management (CRM) systems, custom-built applications. [3] Their logs reveal application-specific events and potential exploitation attempts. [10]
• Cloud Environments: Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) platforms (AWS EC2, Azure VMs), Platform-as-a-Service (PaaS) components (serverless functions, managed databases), Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) applications (Microsoft 365, Salesforce). [7] Cloud providers offer extensive logging mechanisms for actions taken within their environments. [6]
• Identity & Access Management (IAM) Systems: Active Directory, Okta, Ping Identity, Azure AD. [3] These systems log authentication, authorization, and privilege changes, critical for detecting identity-based attacks. [3]
• Security Tools: SIEMs, EDR platforms, Network Detection and Response (NDR) solutions, Data Loss Prevention (DLP) systems, Vulnerability Management platforms. These tools often generate their own operational logs and consolidated security events that contribute to the overall telemetry picture. [3]

4.2. Collection Methodologies

The method of collection depends heavily on the source and the type of telemetry. Common methodologies include: [7]

• Agents: For endpoints (workstations, servers), agents (e.g., EDR agents, log forwarders) are deployed to collect highly granular data directly from the operating system, processes, and network interfaces. Agents can perform real-time collection, local parsing, and filtering before forwarding data to a central repository. [4]
• Syslog: A venerable standard for forwarding log messages in IP networks. Many network devices, Linux/Unix systems, and some applications can be configured to send their logs via Syslog to a central Syslog server or log collector. [11]
• APIs (Application Programming Interfaces): Cloud services, SaaS applications, and modern security tools increasingly expose APIs for programmatic access to their logs and telemetry. This method is highly scalable and enables structured data retrieval, often in JSON or XML formats. [10]
• Network Taps/Port Mirroring (SPAN): For network flow data and full packet capture, dedicated network taps or switch port analyzer (SPAN) ports can mirror traffic to a collector. This provides passive, out-of-band monitoring of network communications.
• Log Forwarders/Collectors: Specialized software agents or appliances (e.g., Splunk Universal Forwarder, Elastic Beats, Kafka Connectors) are designed to collect, parse, and forward logs from various sources to a centralized SIEM or data lake. They often provide features like buffering, encryption, and compression. [12]
• Native Integrations: Many modern security platforms offer native integrations with other popular security tools or cloud services, simplifying the data ingestion process.

The choice of collection method often involves trade-offs between granularity, overhead, real-time capability, and ease of deployment. A multi-faceted approach leveraging several of these methods is typically required to achieve comprehensive telemetry coverage.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

5. Lifecycle of Security Telemetry

The journey of security telemetry from its point of origin to actionable intelligence involves several distinct stages, forming a critical lifecycle that dictates its utility and longevity. [12]

5.1. Ingestion

Ingestion is the initial phase where raw telemetry is collected from its diverse sources and brought into a centralized system. [12] This stage involves:

• Collection: As described in Section 4.2, using agents, APIs, Syslog, etc. [12]
• Parsing: Extracting meaningful fields from unstructured or semi-structured raw data into a structured format (e.g., JSON, key-value pairs). This is crucial for subsequent analysis. [11]
• Normalization: Mapping diverse data formats and field names from different sources to a common schema. For example, ensuring that “source_ip” from a firewall log is understood as the same concept as “client_ip” from a web server log. This standardization enables effective correlation across disparate data sets.

5.2. Storage

Once ingested and normalized, telemetry must be stored in a scalable and performant manner. [10] Storage strategies often involve tiered approaches to balance cost and accessibility: [11]

• Hot Storage: For immediate analysis and real-time detection (e.g., data ingested into a SIEM’s active indexes, or a data warehouse for rapid querying).
• Warm Storage: For frequently accessed historical data, supporting proactive threat hunting and incident investigations (e.g., warm indexes in a SIEM, high-performance object storage).
• Cold Storage/Archival: For long-term retention driven by compliance requirements or long-tail forensic needs, typically using cost-effective object storage or tape libraries.

The choice of storage technology (e.g., relational databases, NoSQL databases, data lakes, distributed file systems) impacts query performance, scalability, and cost. Modern approaches increasingly leverage data lakes or lakehouses for flexible, cost-effective storage of raw and processed telemetry. [8]

5.3. Processing and Enrichment

After ingestion, telemetry is often enhanced to provide greater context and analytical value:

• Enrichment: Augmenting telemetry with external context. This can include:
  • Threat Intelligence: Adding information about known malicious IPs, domains, or hashes.
  • Asset Context: Attaching details about the source asset (e.g., criticality, owner, operating system, vulnerabilities).
  • Identity Context: Linking user IDs to department, role, or risk scores.
  • Geolocation: Adding geographical location data for IP addresses.
  • External Data: Integrating data from HR systems, CMDBs, or vulnerability scanners. [8]
• Aggregation/Summarization: Reducing the volume of data by summarizing common events or consolidating redundant entries, while retaining key information.
• Filtering: Removing irrelevant or noisy data points early in the pipeline to reduce storage and processing overhead. [12]

5.4. Analysis

This is the core stage where telemetry is transformed into actionable intelligence. [12] Analytical techniques include:

• Rule-Based Detection: Applying predefined rules and signatures to identify known attack patterns or policy violations (e.g., “if X happens from IP Y within Z seconds, alert”). [7]
• Correlation: Linking disparate events across different telemetry sources to build a chain of events, revealing complex attack narratives that individual events might miss. [3]
• Behavioral Analytics (UEBA): Establishing baselines of normal user and entity behavior and identifying deviations (anomalies) that may indicate compromise. [2] This often leverages machine learning.
• Machine Learning (ML): Applying supervised or unsupervised ML models for anomaly detection, clustering similar events, predicting future attacks, or prioritizing alerts based on risk.
• Statistical Analysis: Identifying outliers or significant changes in telemetry patterns.
• Threat Hunting: Proactive exploration of raw telemetry by security analysts to uncover previously undetected threats or adversary activity using hypotheses-driven queries. [4]

5.5. Retention and Disposal

Telemetry data is retained for varying periods based on regulatory compliance requirements and organizational forensic needs. Proper data lifecycle management includes:

• Defined Retention Policies: Specifying how long different types of telemetry must be stored.
• Secure Archiving: Moving older, less frequently accessed data to cost-effective, long-term storage while ensuring its integrity and accessibility for auditing or forensic investigations.
• Secure Disposal: Implementing processes for securely deleting data at the end of its retention period to comply with privacy regulations and reduce storage costs.

Each stage of the telemetry lifecycle presents its own set of technical and operational challenges, requiring robust infrastructure, skilled personnel, and well-defined processes.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

6. Critical Role in Modern Security Operations

Security telemetry is not merely data; it is the lifeblood of a modern Security Operations Center (SOC), underpinning virtually every core function. [3] Its pervasive nature enables a comprehensive approach to cybersecurity, moving beyond reactive defense to proactive detection and rapid response. [7]

6.1. Threat Detection

At its heart, security telemetry powers threat detection capabilities. It provides the raw material for identifying malicious activity across the attack kill chain.

• Known Threat Detection: Telemetry allows for the application of signatures, indicators of compromise (IOCs), and blacklists against incoming data to flag known malware, malicious IP addresses, or attack patterns. [2]
• Behavioral Anomaly Detection: By baselining normal behavior from telemetry over time, deviations (e.g., a user logging in from an unusual location, a server communicating with an unexpected external IP) can be identified, often indicative of zero-day attacks or novel TTPs that signature-based methods would miss. [2]
• Insider Threat Detection: Granular telemetry from endpoints and identity systems helps identify suspicious activities by privileged users or employees attempting to exfiltrate data or abuse access. [2]
• Cloud Security Monitoring: Cloud-native telemetry (e.g., CloudTrail, Activity Logs) is indispensable for detecting unauthorized resource provisioning, policy violations, and misconfigurations in dynamic cloud environments. [6]

6.2. Incident Response and Forensics

When a security incident occurs, telemetry transitions from a detection mechanism to a critical forensic resource. [4]

• Root Cause Analysis: By tracing the chronological sequence of events across various telemetry sources, analysts can pinpoint the initial point of compromise, the methods used by attackers, and the extent of the breach. [3]
• Containment and Eradication: Telemetry provides the real-time visibility needed to identify compromised systems, isolate them from the network, and verify the successful eradication of threats. [2]
• Impact Assessment: Understanding what data was accessed, modified, or exfiltrated relies heavily on analyzing logs and network flows.
• Post-Incident Review: Comprehensive telemetry allows for detailed post-mortem analysis, identifying weaknesses in defenses and informing future security improvements. [7]

6.3. Compliance and Auditing

Regulatory frameworks (e.g., GDPR, HIPAA, PCI DSS, SOX) mandate specific requirements for data logging, retention, and audit trails. Security telemetry provides the verifiable evidence necessary to demonstrate adherence to these regulations. [7]

• Audit Trails: Logs of user activities, system changes, and access attempts serve as essential audit trails for compliance reporting.
• Data Access Monitoring: Telemetry from databases and applications helps prove that sensitive data is accessed only by authorized personnel and for legitimate purposes.
• Policy Enforcement Verification: Security device logs can demonstrate that security policies (e.g., firewall rules, access controls) are correctly enforced.

6.4. Security Posture Management and Proactive Threat Hunting

Beyond reactive functions, telemetry supports proactive security initiatives.

• Vulnerability Management: Correlating vulnerability scan data with active telemetry can prioritize patching efforts based on actual exposure or exploitation attempts. [2]
• Security Control Efficacy: Analyzing telemetry helps assess whether existing security controls (e.g., antivirus, firewalls) are performing as expected and identifying gaps.
• Threat Hunting: Security telemetry is the primary data source for proactive threat hunting. [4] Analysts formulate hypotheses about potential adversary activity and then query the telemetry data to validate or refute these hypotheses, often uncovering threats that automated systems have missed. [3], [4]

In essence, security telemetry transforms disparate data points into a cohesive, actionable narrative, enabling organizations to understand, defend against, and recover from cyber threats more effectively. [2]

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

7. Challenges in Managing and Analyzing Vast Telemetry Data

The “deluge” of security telemetry, while offering unprecedented visibility, also presents formidable challenges that can overwhelm even sophisticated security operations. [8] These challenges primarily stem from the “3 Vs” of big data: Volume, Velocity, and Variety, exacerbated by the unique demands of security analytics. [2]

7.1. Volume and Velocity

Organizations generate terabytes, and often petabytes, of security telemetry daily. The sheer volume creates significant hurdles:

• Storage Costs: Storing vast amounts of data for extended periods (often mandated by compliance) can be prohibitively expensive, especially for hot storage tiers required for rapid querying. [10], [8]
• Scalability: Traditional databases and analytical tools often struggle to scale economically and performantly to ingest, index, and query such high data volumes and velocities in real-time. [10]
• Network Bandwidth: Transmitting large amounts of telemetry from distributed sources to a central collection point can strain network bandwidth and introduce latency. [10], [12]

7.2. Variety and Normalization Complexity

The diverse nature of telemetry sources (endpoints, networks, applications, cloud, identity) leads to a myriad of data formats, schemas, and semantic differences. [3]

• Parsing and Normalization: Transforming unstructured raw logs into a unified, queryable format is a complex, resource-intensive, and error-prone process. [11] Misconfigurations or incomplete parsing can lead to lost insights. [12]
• Schema Management: Maintaining a consistent schema across hundreds or thousands of data sources, each with evolving formats, is a continuous operational burden. [11]
• Contextualization: Enriching raw telemetry with external context (e.g., asset criticality, user roles, threat intelligence) is essential for meaningful analysis but adds another layer of complexity to the data pipeline. [8]

7.3. Signal-to-Noise Ratio and Alert Fatigue

The vastness of telemetry often contains more “noise” (benign activity, system chatter) than “signal” (actual threats).

• High False Positives: Overly broad detection rules or insufficient baselining can generate an overwhelming number of false positive alerts, leading to alert fatigue among analysts. [2]
• Missing Critical Signals: Crucial threat indicators can be buried within the noise, making them difficult to detect without sophisticated analytics.
• Analyst Burnout: Constantly triaging an excessive number of alerts, many of which are false positives, leads to analyst burnout, reduced efficiency, and a higher risk of missing genuine threats. [2]

7.4. Staffing and Skill Gaps

The specialized skills required to manage and analyze security telemetry are in high demand and short supply.

• Data Engineering Expertise: Building and maintaining scalable data pipelines, parsing engines, and storage solutions requires expertise in data engineering, cloud platforms, and distributed systems.
• Security Data Science: Deriving advanced insights from telemetry, building machine learning models for anomaly detection, and conducting complex threat hunts demands data science skills combined with deep cybersecurity knowledge.
• Security Analytics Skills: Analysts need to be proficient in complex query languages (e.g., KQL, SPL, SQL), understand data models, and possess strong investigative methodologies.

7.5. Privacy and Data Governance

Collecting and storing extensive telemetry, especially that containing personally identifiable information (PII) or sensitive business data, raises significant privacy and governance concerns. [2]

• Regulatory Compliance: Adhering to regulations like GDPR, CCPA, and HIPAA regarding data collection, processing, retention, and access is a complex legal and operational challenge. [2]
• Data Minimization: Balancing the need for comprehensive telemetry with the principle of collecting only necessary data to mitigate privacy risks.
• Access Control: Ensuring that only authorized personnel have access to sensitive telemetry data is paramount. [2]

Addressing these challenges requires a strategic approach, leveraging advanced technologies, robust architectural designs, and continuous investment in skilled personnel and process optimization. The effectiveness of a security program directly correlates with its ability to overcome these hurdles and transform raw telemetry into actionable security intelligence. [3]

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

8. The Future of Security Telemetry

The trajectory of security telemetry is defined by its ongoing evolution to meet increasingly sophisticated threats and complex IT environments. Several key trends are shaping its future, promising greater automation, deeper insights, and more efficient operations.

8.1. AI and Machine Learning for Advanced Analytics

The reliance on Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) for telemetry analysis is rapidly expanding. [5]

• Automated Anomaly Detection: ML algorithms can autonomously establish baselines of normal behavior and identify subtle deviations that indicate threats, reducing the burden on human analysts. [2]
• Risk Scoring and Alert Prioritization: AI can analyze multiple telemetry signals to assign a risk score to events or entities, allowing security teams to focus on the highest-priority threats and mitigate alert fatigue. [5]
• Predictive Analytics: Beyond reactive detection, advanced ML models aim to predict future attacks or vulnerabilities by identifying precursor behaviors or emerging threat patterns from telemetry.
• Automated Response: Integration of AI/ML with Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response (SOAR) platforms enables automated responses to detected threats, such as isolating a compromised endpoint or blocking a malicious IP address, based on telemetry-driven insights. [8]

8.2. Data Lakes and Lakehouses for Unified Storage and Analysis

The traditional SIEM model often struggles with the volume and variety of modern telemetry. Data lakes and the newer data lakehouse architectures are emerging as preferred solutions for scalable, cost-effective storage and analysis. [8]

• Unified Data Repository: Data lakes allow for the ingestion and storage of raw, unparsed telemetry from all sources without prior schema definition, offering maximum flexibility. [8]
• Cost Efficiency: Object storage, often used in data lakes, is significantly more cost-effective than traditional database storage for petabytes of data. [8]
• Advanced Analytics Workloads: Data lakes integrate well with various analytical engines (e.g., Spark, Presto, cloud data warehousing services) that can perform complex queries, machine learning, and batch processing on large datasets, enabling deeper security insights. [8]
• Schema-on-Read Flexibility: The ability to apply schema at the time of reading (schema-on-read) rather than ingestion (schema-on-write) provides greater agility as telemetry formats evolve.

Lakehouses combine the flexibility of data lakes with the data management features of data warehouses, offering ACID transactions and structured data operations on top of data lake storage, which is particularly beneficial for security analytics requiring both raw data flexibility and query performance. [8]

8.3. Open Standards and Interoperability

The fragmented nature of security telemetry, with proprietary formats and vendor-specific schemas, has historically hindered comprehensive analysis. The future points towards greater adoption of open standards.

• Common Information Model (CIM): Initiatives like Splunk’s CIM aim to standardize field names and event types across different data sources, making correlation easier.
• Open Cybersecurity Schema Framework (OCSF): A newer, vendor-agnostic initiative backed by major players like AWS, Splunk, and IBM, OCSF aims to provide a standardized, open-source schema for security events. [9] This promises to significantly reduce the burden of parsing and normalization, enhancing interoperability between security tools. [9]
• Shift to Structured Data Formats: An increasing number of sources are moving towards structured formats like JSON or Avro, simplifying parsing compared to traditional Syslog. [11]

8.4. Edge Processing and Federated Analytics

To address bandwidth constraints and latency, a trend towards processing telemetry closer to its source (at the “edge”) is emerging. [12]

• Distributed Architectures: Filtering, aggregation, and initial anomaly detection may occur on endpoints or network devices before forwarding only relevant data to central repositories. [12]
• Federated Learning: In scenarios involving sensitive data, machine learning models could be trained on local telemetry datasets without data ever leaving the organization’s premises, then shared with a central model, enhancing privacy.

8.5. Focus on Context and Risk-Based Prioritization

The future of telemetry analysis will move beyond mere detection to comprehensive risk assessment. [9]

• Automated Contextualization: Tools will increasingly automate the enrichment of telemetry with asset criticality, user identity, business process context, and real-time threat intelligence. [8], [9]
• Risk-Based Alerting: Instead of simply alerting on anomalies, systems will prioritize alerts based on the confluence of technical indicators, asset criticality, and business impact, enabling security teams to focus on truly impactful threats. [9]

The future of security telemetry is characterized by a drive towards automation, standardization, and intelligent analysis, moving security operations from a reactive, labor-intensive discipline to a more proactive, data-driven, and efficient one. [8]

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

9. Conclusion

Security telemetry stands as the indispensable foundation of modern cybersecurity, providing the granular insights necessary to navigate an increasingly complex and hostile digital landscape. From the proliferation of diverse log types to the emergence of highly granular endpoint and cloud-native signals, the sheer volume, velocity, and variety of this data present both unparalleled opportunities for enhanced visibility and profound challenges in terms of collection, processing, and analysis. This report has meticulously explored the multifaceted nature of security telemetry, detailing its varied forms, myriad sources, and the intricate lifecycle that transforms raw data into actionable intelligence crucial for threat detection, incident response, and regulatory compliance.

While the “relentless explosion” of telemetry has undeniably created a “deluge” of data, it is precisely within this volume that the subtle indicators of advanced persistent threats and sophisticated attacks reside. The inherent challenges of managing storage costs, overcoming parsing complexities, combating alert fatigue, and bridging critical skill gaps necessitate a strategic and adaptive approach. Opinions expressed within this report emphasize that simply collecting more data is insufficient; the true value lies in the ability to intelligently process, correlate, and contextualize this information at scale.

The future of security telemetry is bright, driven by innovations in artificial intelligence and machine learning, the adoption of scalable data lake and lakehouse architectures, and a growing commitment to open standards and interoperability. These advancements promise to automate much of the current manual burden, enhance the signal-to-noise ratio, and enable more proactive, risk-informed security decisions. Ultimately, by effectively harnessing the power of security telemetry, organizations can move beyond reactive crisis management towards a state of predictive, resilient, and adaptive security operations, transforming the overwhelming deluge into a wellspring of actionable intelligence critical for safeguarding digital assets in the 21st century.

Many thanks to our sponsor Esdebe who helped us prepare this research report.

References

[1] Training Camp. (n.d.). What is Security Telemetry? – Glossary. Retrieved June 29, 2025, from https://www.trainingcamp.com/glossary/security-telemetry/
[2] Proofpoint US. (n.d.). What Is Telemetry? Telemetry Cybersecurity Explained. Retrieved June 29, 2025, from https://www.proofpoint.com/us/blog/security-awareness/what-is-telemetry-cybersecurity-explained
[3] Comcast Technology Solutions. (n.d.). What is Security Telemetry?. Retrieved June 29, 2025, from https://business.comcast.com/learn/resources/security-telemetry
[4] HarfangLab. (2024, August 6). Cybersecurity: telemetry explained. Retrieved June 29, 2025, from https://harfanglab.io/en/cybersecurity-telemetry-explained/
[5] Promon. (n.d.). Telemetry – Security Software Glossary. Retrieved June 29, 2025, from https://promon.com/security-software-glossary/telemetry/
[6] Netenrich. (n.d.). What is Security telemetry | ITOps Glossary. Retrieved June 29, 2025, from https://netenrich.com/glossary/security-telemetry/
[7] Arctic Wolf. (2025, April 16). Understanding Telemetry in Cybersecurity. Retrieved June 29, 2025, from https://arcticwolf.com/resources/glossary/telemetry-in-cybersecurity/
[8] The Fast Mode. (n.d.). The Future of Security Data: Security Telemetry Pipelines. Retrieved June 29, 2025, from https://www.thefastmode.com/expert-opinion/36605-the-future-of-security-data-security-telemetry-pipelines
[9] Anomali. (2025, May 19). Redefining Security Telemetry: Why Context (Not Logs) Is the Next Frontier. Retrieved June 29, 2025, from https://www.anomali.com/blog/redefining-security-telemetry-why-context-not-logs-is-the-next-frontier
[10] Splunk. (2023, October 5). Telemetry 101: An Introduction To Telemetry. Retrieved June 29, 2025, from https://www.splunk.com/en_us/data-insights/what-is-telemetry.html
[11] Graylog. (2025, June 11). Telemetry: What It Is and How it Enables Security. Retrieved June 29, 2025, from https://graylog.com/blog/telemetry-what-it-is-and-how-it-enables-security/
[12] Onum. (2025, March 24). Telemetry Cybersecurity: Tutorial & Best Practices. Retrieved June 29, 2025, from https://onum.io/blog/telemetry-cybersecurity/
[13] Sematext. (n.d.). Telemetry vs. Logging: Main Differences Explained. Retrieved June 29, 2025, from https://sematext.com/blog/telemetry-vs-logging/