Stellantis Confirms Data Breach

Stellantis, the multinational automaker known for brands such as Jeep, Dodge, and Fiat, recently confirmed a data breach stemming from a cyberattack on a third-party service provider supporting its North American customer service operations. The breach exposed customer contact information but did not compromise financial or sensitive personal data. The company has activated its incident response protocols, notified authorities, and is directly informing affected customers.

Details of the Breach

The unauthorized access occurred on a third-party platform that Stellantis utilizes for customer service operations in North America. The compromised data was limited to basic contact information, including names, email addresses, and phone numbers. Importantly, the affected platform does not store financial or sensitive personal information, and none of this data was accessed during the breach.

Company Response

Upon discovering the incident, Stellantis immediately activated its incident response protocols, initiated a comprehensive investigation, and took prompt action to contain and mitigate the situation. The company has notified the appropriate authorities and is directly informing affected customers. Stellantis is also urging customers to remain vigilant against potential phishing attempts and to avoid clicking on suspicious links or sharing personal information in response to unexpected emails, texts, or calls.

Protect your businesss most important asset TrueNAS keeps your data safe and secure.

Industry Context

This breach is part of a broader trend of cyberattacks targeting the automotive industry. Earlier this month, Jaguar Land Rover experienced a significant cybersecurity incident that disrupted its operations and forced factory shutdowns. The automotive sector’s increasing reliance on digital platforms and third-party service providers has made it a prime target for cybercriminals.

Customer Advisory

Stellantis advises customers to be cautious of unsolicited communications claiming to be from the company. Customers should avoid clicking on links or sharing personal information in response to unexpected emails, texts, or calls. If customers have questions or concerns, they should contact Stellantis directly through official channels.

Conclusion

While the breach exposed customer contact information, Stellantis has taken swift and decisive action to address the incident. The company remains committed to safeguarding customer data and maintaining trust. Customers are encouraged to stay vigilant and report any suspicious activities to the appropriate authorities.

References

  • “Car giant Stellantis confirms data breach after third-party hit by cyberattack.” TechRadar, September 23, 2025. (techradar.com)

  • “Stellantis detects breach at third-party provider for North American customers.” Reuters, September 21, 2025. (reuters.com)

  • “Stellantis reports data breach at third-party platform affecting North American customers.” CBT News, September 22, 2025. (cbtnews.com)

  • “Stellantis, Parent Company of Citroën, FIAT, Jeep, Confirms Data Breach.” Cyber Press, September 22, 2025. (cyberpress.org)

  • “Stellantis: Third-party platform data incident.” Automotive World, September 21, 2025. (automotiveworld.com)

  • “24th Sept 2025 Cyber Update: Stellantis Discloses Major Third-Party Data Breach.” Cyber News Centre, September 24, 2025. (cybernewscentre.com)

  • “Stellantis Salesforce Data Breach: 18M Records Exposed in 2025.” Firecompass, September 23, 2025. (firecompass.com)

  • “Stellantis auto manufacturer confirms breach.” Cybernews, September 24, 2025. (cybernews.com)

  • “Stellantis compromised by ShinyHunters’ Salesforce hack.” SC Media, September 23, 2025. (scworld.com)

  • “Stellantis Carmaker Data Breach Exposes Customer Data.” TechNadu, September 22, 2025. (technadu.com)

  • “Stellantis says a third-party vendor spilled customer data.” The Register, September 22, 2025. (theregister.com)

  • “Stellantis detects breach at third-party provider for North American customers.” Investing.com, September 21, 2025. (investing.com)

  • “Automaker giant Stellantis confirms data breach after Salesforce hack.” Network Security Magazine, September 23, 2025. (network-security-magazine.com)

  • “Stellantis probes data breach linked to third-party provider.” Actu365, September 23, 2025. (actu365.com)

42 Comments

  1. The increasing frequency of attacks via third-party vendors highlights a critical vulnerability. What proactive measures, such as more stringent vendor risk assessments or enhanced security protocols for third-party access, can companies implement to mitigate these risks effectively?

    • Great question! Stringent vendor risk assessments are definitely key. Companies can also implement regular security audits and penetration testing for third-party systems. Clear contractual agreements outlining security responsibilities and data protection standards are essential too. Thanks for raising this important point!

      Editor: StorageTech.News

      Thank you to our Sponsor Esdebe

  2. So, even Jeeps aren’t immune to cyber potholes! Makes you wonder if “Are you still watching?” is the new phishing tactic for Netflix accounts AND car data now. Time to double-check those suspicious emails!

    • That’s a clever connection! It’s definitely worth being extra cautious with emails these days. The thought of our car data being a target is a little unsettling, isn’t it? Staying vigilant is key to protecting ourselves from these evolving phishing tactics.

      Editor: StorageTech.News

      Thank you to our Sponsor Esdebe

  3. The automotive industry’s increasing reliance on third-party services presents unique challenges. How are companies adapting their cybersecurity strategies to address the expanding attack surface created by connected vehicles and diverse supplier networks?

    • That’s a really important question! Many companies are now shifting towards a ‘zero trust’ approach, even within their own network and especially with third-party vendors. This involves continuous verification and limiting access to only what’s absolutely necessary. It’s a complex issue with evolving solutions. Thanks for bringing it up!

      Editor: StorageTech.News

      Thank you to our Sponsor Esdebe

  4. The incident underscores the importance of robust third-party risk management. Beyond initial assessments, are companies continuously monitoring their vendors’ security posture for evolving threats and vulnerabilities?

    • That’s a really crucial point! Continuous monitoring is definitely the direction we need to move in. It’s not enough to just check vendors once. What methods do you find most effective for ongoing security assessments?

      Editor: StorageTech.News

      Thank you to our Sponsor Esdebe

  5. The automotive sector’s increasing reliance on third-party services is a growing concern. Implementing robust data encryption, both in transit and at rest, across all third-party platforms is crucial for protecting sensitive customer information, regardless of access controls.

    • That’s absolutely right. The expanding use of third-party services introduces significant vulnerabilities. Data encryption is critical, and I think that it is essential to have a plan to regularly review and update your data encryption algorithms. I think this is essential for continued protection. Thanks for your input!

      Editor: StorageTech.News

      Thank you to our Sponsor Esdebe

  6. Given the industry-wide increase in these incidents, how are automotive companies incentivizing their third-party providers to prioritize and invest in robust cybersecurity measures?

    • That’s a great point! It’s crucial to create a culture of security. I believe that offering incentives like preferred partnerships or public recognition for achieving high security standards could motivate third-party providers to invest in better cybersecurity. What are some other incentives that you think could work well?

      Editor: StorageTech.News

      Thank you to our Sponsor Esdebe

  7. It’s good to see Stellantis taking swift action by activating its incident response protocols and notifying affected customers. Implementing a comprehensive communication strategy that offers transparent updates and support could further strengthen customer trust during such incidents.

    • Thanks for highlighting the importance of communication! Building trust through transparent updates is key to handling incidents effectively. We’re looking into ways to improve communication strategies to keep our customers informed and supported throughout these situations. Appreciate your input!

      Editor: StorageTech.News

      Thank you to our Sponsor Esdebe

  8. Given the industry trend of attacks via third parties, how are companies determining the acceptable level of risk when selecting and managing these providers? What metrics beyond compliance certifications are proving most effective in assessing true security posture?

    • That’s a vital question! It’s definitely more than just ticking boxes on compliance. I am interested in exploring how companies are creating bespoke risk assessments tailored to the specific data and access third-party providers have. Are specific threat modeling scenarios helping to define the acceptable risk level?

      Editor: StorageTech.News

      Thank you to our Sponsor Esdebe

  9. The industry context is critical. Given the rise in automotive cyberattacks, it would be interesting to know what specific cybersecurity standards or frameworks Stellantis requires its third-party providers to adhere to, beyond general compliance.

    • That’s an excellent point! It’s more than just ticking boxes. Knowing which specific standards are mandated would certainly give a better understanding of the robustness of their cybersecurity requirements. Perhaps they’re using something like ISO 27001 or NIST CSF as a baseline? Or maybe something automotive specific?

      Editor: StorageTech.News

      Thank you to our Sponsor Esdebe

  10. The swift response is commendable. Considering the trend, what strategies are automotive companies using to ensure third-party providers have adequate security awareness training for their staff, given that human error is frequently a contributing factor in breaches?

    • Thanks for raising the topic of security awareness! It’s crucial. Beyond the training itself, I’m interested in how automotive companies measure the effectiveness of these programs. Are they using simulated phishing attacks, or other metrics, to gauge how well the training is sinking in?

      Editor: StorageTech.News

      Thank you to our Sponsor Esdebe

  11. Given that the breached data was limited to contact information, what methods are companies employing to identify and proactively mitigate potential threats stemming from the aggregation of seemingly innocuous data points?

    • That’s a great question! Data aggregation is a rising threat. Companies are beginning to use AI-driven tools to identify unusual patterns and correlations in seemingly harmless datasets. These tools flag potential risks that humans might miss, allowing for preemptive action. It’s an evolving field, and I think it will continue to be important moving forward!

      Editor: StorageTech.News

      Thank you to our Sponsor Esdebe

  12. The advisory to customers regarding phishing attempts is spot on. Beyond vigilance, what proactive steps can customers take to better protect themselves against such attacks, especially given the increasing sophistication of phishing techniques?

    • That’s an excellent question! Beyond vigilance, multi-factor authentication on all accounts is key. Also, regularly updating passwords and using a password manager adds another layer of security. What other strategies have you found helpful?

      Editor: StorageTech.News

      Thank you to our Sponsor Esdebe

  13. Phishing attempts, you say? Given this contact info breach, are we expecting personalized phishing campaigns now? I wonder if they’ll offer me a screaming deal on a new Jeep… I might be tempted.

    • That’s a funny thought! Personalized phishing is a real concern. What if the deal on that Jeep was too good to be true? It highlights the need to really scrutinize any offers, especially if they seem tailored to your interests. Stay safe out there!

      Editor: StorageTech.News

      Thank you to our Sponsor Esdebe

  14. Given the industry context, how are automotive companies adapting to the increasing complexities of managing cybersecurity risks across their expanding ecosystem of interconnected digital platforms and third-party service providers?

    • That’s a great question! Many automotive companies are exploring enhanced vendor risk management programs. This involves not just assessments but also real-time monitoring and threat intelligence sharing with third-party partners. It’s an ongoing effort to stay ahead of evolving cyber threats! What are your thoughts on the effectiveness of shared threat intelligence?

      Editor: StorageTech.News

      Thank you to our Sponsor Esdebe

  15. A breach at a third-party *again*? Do these providers have “hack me please” signs on their servers? I wonder if they’re using carrier pigeons to transmit data; might be more secure! Seriously though, are we sure it wasn’t just a rogue Roomba vacuuming up the customer database?

    • That’s a funny analogy! The idea of a Roomba vacuuming up data is amusing, though I think the reality is that these breaches can stem from a range of vulnerabilities. From weak access controls to unpatched systems, the threat landscape is evolving constantly. It’s crucial to take these incidents seriously!

      Editor: StorageTech.News

      Thank you to our Sponsor Esdebe

  16. Contact info only, you say? So, they just have my number and email? Guess I should expect a flood of texts offering extended car warranties… for a vehicle I don’t even own! At least it’s not *financial* data, but still, who needs more spam?

    • You’re right, it’s still annoying to get more spam! It just goes to show how valuable even basic contact information can be. I wonder what the monetary value per contact is to a spammer these days?

      Editor: StorageTech.News

      Thank you to our Sponsor Esdebe

  17. “Contact info only”? So, my spam filter’s about to get a serious workout, huh? I wonder if I can invoice Stellantis for the therapy my inbox will need after this. Anyone else suddenly craving a digital detox?

    • That’s a funny thought regarding invoicing Stellantis for inbox therapy! It really does highlight how overwhelming spam can be. Perhaps services that help filter emails more effectively will be in demand. Has anyone tried using AI-powered spam filters?

      Editor: StorageTech.News

      Thank you to our Sponsor Esdebe

  18. The incident response protocols were activated quickly, which is good. Do you think increased regulatory scrutiny on third-party vendor security will become more common to mitigate future risks in the automotive industry?

    • That’s a great point! Increased regulatory scrutiny on third-party vendors is definitely a likely outcome. Standardizing security requirements and audit processes could help ensure consistent protection across the industry. Do you think a collaborative framework between automotive companies and regulators could be effective?

      Editor: StorageTech.News

      Thank you to our Sponsor Esdebe

  19. Contact info only, huh? So, if I start getting spam calls offering me *exactly* the car I’ve been dreaming of, I’ll know where they got my wish list. Just kidding… mostly. Seriously though, anyone else suddenly reconsidering their ringtone?

    • That’s a funny thought, I think we’re all having a good look at our privacy settings these days. Regarding personalized offers, perhaps AI-powered tools could help us identify and filter out suspicious or malicious communications more effectively? Is anyone using anything like that already?

      Editor: StorageTech.News

      Thank you to our Sponsor Esdebe

  20. Stellantis is urging vigilance against phishing. Considering that the compromised data includes email addresses and phone numbers, what specific strategies are companies employing to educate customers on identifying increasingly sophisticated phishing attempts?

    • That’s a great point about phishing education! Besides vigilance, I think simulating phishing attacks within a company’s own staff can be a highly effective training tool. What do you think of this type of simulation?

      Editor: StorageTech.News

      Thank you to our Sponsor Esdebe

  21. “Contact info only,” huh? So, it’s like a digital “kick me” sign for spammers? Seriously though, what’s stopping them from cross-referencing that info with other breaches for a richer profile? Asking for a friend… whose spam folder is already overflowing.

    • You raise a very valid concern! Even seemingly harmless “contact info only” can be combined with other data points to build quite a profile. It highlights the need for stronger data protection laws and better practices around data minimization. I wonder if there should be stricter rules about how long companies can keep our contact info, for example?

      Editor: StorageTech.News

      Thank you to our Sponsor Esdebe

Comments are closed.